• The early word is that the 2012 National Biodiesel Conference attendance is going to be much higher than 2011. Follow along in photos.
  • The Zimmcomm Network

  • Archives

  • Categories

Consumer Retorts

Consumer Reports The media has made much this week about the Consumer Reports report that ethanol is less fuel efficient than gasoline. This is something the ethanol industry freely admits.

The “quick take” from the Consumer Report is this:
E85, which is 85 percent ethanol, emits less smog-causing pollutants than gasoline, but provides fewer miles per gallon, costs more, and is hard to find outside the Midwest.

All true statements at this particular point in time. The first statement – that ethanol “emits less smog-causing pollutants than gasoline” – is universally true and will not change. It is also one of the primary reasons that people who are concerned about global warming or other environmental issues should advocate the use of ethanol in this country.

The second statement – that ethanol provides few miles per gallon – could change if auto makers come up with different types of engines that are made to run on ethanol instead of gasoline. Indy cars are being tuned to run more efficiently on ethanol, since they are making the switch to 100 percent ethanol next year.

Third – ethanol costs more. This is a changable truth. Consumer Reports only looked at ethanol prices in the past several months when they have been historically high due to strong demand fueled by the switch from MTBE to ethanol as an oxygenate in major metropolitan areas. The basic law of supply and demand dictates that the price will decline as the supply increases, and in fact, prices have already come down in recent weeks.

Finally, the lack of availability outside the midwest is changing every day. For example, Phil Lampert with the National Ethanol Vehicle Coalition notes that Kroger just opened about 20 new E85 fueling stations in Texas, and he says, “By this time next year we expect to have 300 (e85) stations in New York state where today there are zero.”

NEVC would like to see 1500 E85 pumps around the nation by the end of this year. The NEVC website www.e85fuel.org is updated daily with new places where E85 fuel can be found around the nation.

Since most ethanol production facilities are located in the midwest, that’s where most of the E85 pumps are going right now. But, as production begins to start up in New York, California, Texas, Florida, etc. there will be more and more. Ethanol is about the environment, national security and vehicle performance, not about fuel economy. But, hopefully as production increases it will ultimately end up costing less and saving consumers money in the long run.

No one expects ethanol to completely replace gasoline, but simply REDUCING our dependence on foreign oil is a step in the right direction.

    4 Comments »

  • September 2, 2006 — 1:45 pm

    Gary Dikkers

    Instead of demanding fuel retailers invest money building E85 infrastructure, a smarter play would be to push for broader acceptance of E10. No new infrastructure needed, and no need for special flex fuel vehicles.

    Part of the reluctance of fuel retailers to commit to E85 is that they know that if they all do it, they will have trouble getting the ethanol to make money from their investment.

    Please explain why the price of ethanol almost always correlates to the price of fossil fuels? When gasoline and diesel go up, the retail price of ethanol also goes up and vice versa. At times it almost appears the two industries are in cahoots when it comes to pricing.

  • September 2, 2006 — 7:27 pm

    Cindy

    Sorry I always have to edit your comments, Gary – but you can make your points in many less words if you try.

    And you have a good point about E10 – some people in the industry do feel that more emphasis should be placed on that instead of E85. But, why not both? I like the “boutique” concept allowing people to choose what type of fuel they want.

    I think there is a direct correlation between ethanol and gas prices – who do you think is buying the stuff?

  • September 2, 2006 — 7:52 pm

    Gary Dikkers

    Unfortunately, you omitted the most important point:
    If the entire US corn crop were used for ethanol, it would equal less than 12% of entire US fuel consumption. That means the ethanol industry would have trouble supplying enough product to make E10 of all the gasoline sold in the US.

    That also means if all the fuel stations in the US invested money to build E85 infrastructure, much of that infrastructure would have to sit unused because the ethanol industry simply couldn’t supply the product to support an E85 pump at every fuel station in the country — a fact that fuel retailers are clearly aware of.

  • September 3, 2006 — 12:32 pm

    Cindy

    I omitted it because we have heard this a million times already. For some reason, people like you are so focused on CORN ethanol that you can’t see any further than that. We do stories every day on new feedstocks for ethanol.
    Besides that – there are no plans for ethanol to replace all of the fuel sold in the US. We are talking REDUCING our dependence on foreign oil and having CHOICES – not black and white, either/or.

  • Comments RSS feedTrackBack URI

    Leave a Comment