<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Americans Buying Record Numbers of Alternative Fuel Autos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticfuel.com/2007/10/16/americans-buying-record-numbers-of-alternative-fuel-autos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2007/10/16/americans-buying-record-numbers-of-alternative-fuel-autos/</link>
	<description>Alternative Fuel News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:37:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: associationsx &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Americans Buying Record Numbers of Alternative Fuel Autos</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2007/10/16/americans-buying-record-numbers-of-alternative-fuel-autos/comment-page-1/#comment-57187</link>
		<dc:creator>associationsx &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Americans Buying Record Numbers of Alternative Fuel Autos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=3192#comment-57187</guid>
		<description>[...] more here  This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 at 10:15 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here  This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 at 10:15 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rufus</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2007/10/16/americans-buying-record-numbers-of-alternative-fuel-autos/comment-page-1/#comment-56302</link>
		<dc:creator>Rufus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=3192#comment-56302</guid>
		<description>Now, wouldn&#039;t it be super-duper nice if they would give us an engine that was actually, you know, somewhat suited to a 105 Octane fuel?

Has everyone just skipped over the fantastic fuel efficiency the &quot;Indy&quot; cars got with ethanol in their &quot;Optimized&quot; engines?

Could we at least get a pickup truck, or something with a high compression, E85 Dedicated Engine.  Don&#039;t they know how many of those they would sell?

How about a &quot;Biopower&quot; type engine.  Gives up 5% consumption in a 20% more powerful engine, on a fuel that&#039;s selling in many places for less than $2.00/gal.  Jeez, what are they thinking?

Love your blog,

Rufus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, wouldn&#8217;t it be super-duper nice if they would give us an engine that was actually, you know, somewhat suited to a 105 Octane fuel?</p>
<p>Has everyone just skipped over the fantastic fuel efficiency the &#8220;Indy&#8221; cars got with ethanol in their &#8220;Optimized&#8221; engines?</p>
<p>Could we at least get a pickup truck, or something with a high compression, E85 Dedicated Engine.  Don&#8217;t they know how many of those they would sell?</p>
<p>How about a &#8220;Biopower&#8221; type engine.  Gives up 5% consumption in a 20% more powerful engine, on a fuel that&#8217;s selling in many places for less than $2.00/gal.  Jeez, what are they thinking?</p>
<p>Love your blog,</p>
<p>Rufus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
