<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Study Supports Mid Range Ethanol Blends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticfuel.com/2007/12/05/new-study-supports-mid-range-ethanol-blends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2007/12/05/new-study-supports-mid-range-ethanol-blends/</link>
	<description>Alternative Fuel News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2007/12/05/new-study-supports-mid-range-ethanol-blends/comment-page-1/#comment-136973</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=3522#comment-136973</guid>
		<description>I run e-30 in absolutely every engine I own can-am 800 17mpg running it hard 2008 town&amp;country 25mpg driving 55mph 2004 Impala 30+ lawnmowers weed eaters Ice augers every thing none of the vehicles are flex fuel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run e-30 in absolutely every engine I own can-am 800 17mpg running it hard 2008 town&amp;country 25mpg driving 55mph 2004 Impala 30+ lawnmowers weed eaters Ice augers every thing none of the vehicles are flex fuel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve_V</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2007/12/05/new-study-supports-mid-range-ethanol-blends/comment-page-1/#comment-134323</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve_V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=3522#comment-134323</guid>
		<description>Chris

I have been looking at this for some time now.  If you have any noticeable mileage loss with E10, I wouldn’t be questioning the 10 percent ethanol but what makes up the 90 percent gasoline.  In every SAE paper I have, ethanol has shown to be more efficient then gasoline when simply adding ethanol.  Not enough to overcome the BTU difference but still more efficient.  If you are finding more than 2 or 3 percent mileage difference comparing E10 to E0, find another gas station.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris</p>
<p>I have been looking at this for some time now.  If you have any noticeable mileage loss with E10, I wouldn’t be questioning the 10 percent ethanol but what makes up the 90 percent gasoline.  In every SAE paper I have, ethanol has shown to be more efficient then gasoline when simply adding ethanol.  Not enough to overcome the BTU difference but still more efficient.  If you are finding more than 2 or 3 percent mileage difference comparing E10 to E0, find another gas station.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Taylor</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2007/12/05/new-study-supports-mid-range-ethanol-blends/comment-page-1/#comment-131720</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=3522#comment-131720</guid>
		<description>This study is so full of crap it makes me want to puke.

My Geo Metro Lost 9mpg with E10
My Clubwagon lost 7mpg going from 20mpg to 13mpg
My jeep went from 24 to 16-17
My Minivan hurt me the most going from 28mpg to 20mpg

These low values are NOT because of the lower energy BTU in alcohol. they are because there vehicles are FLAT OUT incompatible with alcohol based fuels. THEY CAN NOT PROPERLY BURN THEM.

put D10 in your car (10% diesel) let me know how it goes. but wait Diesel has MORE BTU&#039;s so why did your mpg&#039;s not go up?

easy. your engine CAN NOT properly burn diesel.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This study is so full of crap it makes me want to puke.</p>
<p>My Geo Metro Lost 9mpg with E10<br />
My Clubwagon lost 7mpg going from 20mpg to 13mpg<br />
My jeep went from 24 to 16-17<br />
My Minivan hurt me the most going from 28mpg to 20mpg</p>
<p>These low values are NOT because of the lower energy BTU in alcohol. they are because there vehicles are FLAT OUT incompatible with alcohol based fuels. THEY CAN NOT PROPERLY BURN THEM.</p>
<p>put D10 in your car (10% diesel) let me know how it goes. but wait Diesel has MORE BTU&#8217;s so why did your mpg&#8217;s not go up?</p>
<p>easy. your engine CAN NOT properly burn diesel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DANIEL D MARTIN</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2007/12/05/new-study-supports-mid-range-ethanol-blends/comment-page-1/#comment-65955</link>
		<dc:creator>DANIEL D MARTIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=3522#comment-65955</guid>
		<description>PERFECT ,IF IS PROVEN GOOD FOR YOUR CAR ,LETS MANDATE E25 OR E30 FOR THE WHOLE COUNTRY ON AS REGULAR GAS SAVING BILLION DOLLARS AS MUCH AS CREATING MANY NEW JOBS,GREAT WIN-WIN SITUATION ,ONLY BIG OIL WILL LOSE SPECIALLY CHAVEZ,IRAN AND SAUDI ARABIA ,ALSO RUSSIA,PAY OUR FARMERS AND NEW DESTILLERIES NOT OPEC,THANKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PERFECT ,IF IS PROVEN GOOD FOR YOUR CAR ,LETS MANDATE E25 OR E30 FOR THE WHOLE COUNTRY ON AS REGULAR GAS SAVING BILLION DOLLARS AS MUCH AS CREATING MANY NEW JOBS,GREAT WIN-WIN SITUATION ,ONLY BIG OIL WILL LOSE SPECIALLY CHAVEZ,IRAN AND SAUDI ARABIA ,ALSO RUSSIA,PAY OUR FARMERS AND NEW DESTILLERIES NOT OPEC,THANKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

