<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethanol Reality Versus Fantasy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticfuel.com/2008/07/31/ethanol-reality-versus-fantasy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2008/07/31/ethanol-reality-versus-fantasy/</link>
	<description>Alternative Fuel News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Bitner</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2008/07/31/ethanol-reality-versus-fantasy/comment-page-1/#comment-91378</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Bitner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=5368#comment-91378</guid>
		<description>Article heading is all talk, no substance.  For being a proponent of ethanol your organization sure is reluctant to put hard data in the 1st paragraph of your articles.

Bottom line:  Will E85 -- under any configuration -- ever come within 5% of 87 octane petrol fuel economy?

Duane</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article heading is all talk, no substance.  For being a proponent of ethanol your organization sure is reluctant to put hard data in the 1st paragraph of your articles.</p>
<p>Bottom line:  Will E85 &#8212; under any configuration &#8212; ever come within 5% of 87 octane petrol fuel economy?</p>
<p>Duane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

