<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Cadillac SRX to be E85 Compatible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticfuel.com/2009/01/05/2010-cadillac-srx-to-be-e85-compatible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/01/05/2010-cadillac-srx-to-be-e85-compatible/</link>
	<description>Alternative Fuel News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auto chart</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/01/05/2010-cadillac-srx-to-be-e85-compatible/comment-page-1/#comment-118673</link>
		<dc:creator>Auto chart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=8776#comment-118673</guid>
		<description>I love the overall body design. Unlike RX, which has been getting uglier with each iteration, SRX is going in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the overall body design. Unlike RX, which has been getting uglier with each iteration, SRX is going in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is there a future for flex-fuel? &#171; The MagicSkyway</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/01/05/2010-cadillac-srx-to-be-e85-compatible/comment-page-1/#comment-111100</link>
		<dc:creator>Is there a future for flex-fuel? &#171; The MagicSkyway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=8776#comment-111100</guid>
		<description>[...] GM’s announcement that its 2010 Cadillac SRX CUV will not incorporate flex technology as had been reported earlier.&#160; Instead, the new Cadillac SRX will be getting smaller and offering as an engine option [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GM’s announcement that its 2010 Cadillac SRX CUV will not incorporate flex technology as had been reported earlier.&#160; Instead, the new Cadillac SRX will be getting smaller and offering as an engine option [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Detroit preview: Cadillac SRX is direct injected but not flex-fuel &#124; greengrowthguys DOT com</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/01/05/2010-cadillac-srx-to-be-e85-compatible/comment-page-1/#comment-111066</link>
		<dc:creator>Detroit preview: Cadillac SRX is direct injected but not flex-fuel &#124; greengrowthguys DOT com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=8776#comment-111066</guid>
		<description>[...] to some reports, the 3.0L SRX will not be a flex-fuel vehicle when it launches this summer. The spec sheet that was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to some reports, the 3.0L SRX will not be a flex-fuel vehicle when it launches this summer. The spec sheet that was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Detroit preview: Cadillac SRX is direct injected but not flex-fuel&#160;&#124;&#160;Gfeen.com</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/01/05/2010-cadillac-srx-to-be-e85-compatible/comment-page-1/#comment-111065</link>
		<dc:creator>Detroit preview: Cadillac SRX is direct injected but not flex-fuel&#160;&#124;&#160;Gfeen.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=8776#comment-111065</guid>
		<description>[...] to so&#173;me&#173; r&#173;e&#173;po&#173;r&#173;t&#173;s, t&#173;he&#173; 3.0L SR&#173;X w&#173;i&#173;ll no&#173;&#173;t&#173; be&#173; a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to so&#173;me&#173; r&#173;e&#173;po&#173;r&#173;t&#173;s, t&#173;he&#173; 3.0L SR&#173;X w&#173;i&#173;ll no&#173;&#173;t&#173; be&#173; a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Detroit preview: Cadillac SRX is direct injected but not flex-fuel &#124; Only Hybrids</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/01/05/2010-cadillac-srx-to-be-e85-compatible/comment-page-1/#comment-111060</link>
		<dc:creator>Detroit preview: Cadillac SRX is direct injected but not flex-fuel &#124; Only Hybrids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=8776#comment-111060</guid>
		<description>[...] to some reports, the 3.0L SRX will not be a flex-fuel vehicle when it launches this summer. The spec sheet that was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to some reports, the 3.0L SRX will not be a flex-fuel vehicle when it launches this summer. The spec sheet that was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

