<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interior Secretary: Wind Could Replace Coal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticfuel.com/2009/04/10/interior-secretary-wind-could-replace-coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/04/10/interior-secretary-wind-could-replace-coal/</link>
	<description>Alternative Fuel News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McCoy</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/04/10/interior-secretary-wind-could-replace-coal/comment-page-1/#comment-113114</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=11613#comment-113114</guid>
		<description>That is a bold pronoucement.  I believe solar power has the same &quot;potential&quot;.  The problem is that both sources are &quot;potential energy.&quot;   Efficiences, conversion, infrastructure, transmission and realistic plans are required to make wind and solar useful for large scale usage.  

The Secretary&#039;s statement is unrealistic and unresponsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a bold pronoucement.  I believe solar power has the same &#8220;potential&#8221;.  The problem is that both sources are &#8220;potential energy.&#8221;   Efficiences, conversion, infrastructure, transmission and realistic plans are required to make wind and solar useful for large scale usage.  </p>
<p>The Secretary&#8217;s statement is unrealistic and unresponsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

