<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Adopts Standard Biased Against Ethanol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticfuel.com/2009/04/24/california-adopts-standard-biased-against-ethanol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/04/24/california-adopts-standard-biased-against-ethanol/</link>
	<description>Alternative Fuel News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Energy Reform? Then Don&#8217;t Follow California. - Domestic Fuel</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/04/24/california-adopts-standard-biased-against-ethanol/comment-page-1/#comment-117034</link>
		<dc:creator>Energy Reform? Then Don&#8217;t Follow California. - Domestic Fuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=12043#comment-117034</guid>
		<description>[...] and energy reform. They passed the first greenhouse gas emissions legislation. They passed the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. But not so fast. They are bankrupt. They still have some of the worst air pollution in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and energy reform. They passed the first greenhouse gas emissions legislation. They passed the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. But not so fast. They are bankrupt. They still have some of the worst air pollution in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

