<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Irrationality of Indirect Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticfuel.com/2009/06/08/the-irrationality-of-indirect-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/06/08/the-irrationality-of-indirect-analysis/</link>
	<description>Alternative Fuel News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indirect Land Use Science Lacking &#38; World Knows it - Domestic Fuel</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/06/08/the-irrationality-of-indirect-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-115887</link>
		<dc:creator>Indirect Land Use Science Lacking &#38; World Knows it - Domestic Fuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=13532#comment-115887</guid>
		<description>[...] another study has found that Searchinger et al.&#8217;s paper on Indirect Land Use was not based on &#8217;sound science&#8217;. According to researchers Professor John Matthews and Dr. Hao Tan, from Macquarie University in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] another study has found that Searchinger et al.&#8217;s paper on Indirect Land Use was not based on &#8217;sound science&#8217;. According to researchers Professor John Matthews and Dr. Hao Tan, from Macquarie University in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Author Robert Zubrin to be Guest on Premier Show &#171; Pure Energy</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/06/08/the-irrationality-of-indirect-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-114332</link>
		<dc:creator>Author Robert Zubrin to be Guest on Premier Show &#171; Pure Energy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=13532#comment-114332</guid>
		<description>[...] Zubrin will tell our listeners how, &#8220;our decades-long relationship with OPEC has resulted in the looting of our economy, the corruption of our political system, and now the funding and protection of terrorist regimes and movements that are committed to our destruction.&#8221; His segment will be nothing short of tantalizing as O&#8217;Hanlon and Zubrin engage in a lively debate about the best way to end America&#8217;s addiction to oil. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Zubrin will tell our listeners how, &#8220;our decades-long relationship with OPEC has resulted in the looting of our economy, the corruption of our political system, and now the funding and protection of terrorist regimes and movements that are committed to our destruction.&#8221; His segment will be nothing short of tantalizing as O&#8217;Hanlon and Zubrin engage in a lively debate about the best way to end America&#8217;s addiction to oil. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peobody09</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/06/08/the-irrationality-of-indirect-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-114007</link>
		<dc:creator>peobody09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=13532#comment-114007</guid>
		<description>Zubrin&#039;s analysis is on the money.  Such an indirect effect analysis could be applied in a similar arbitrary and unscientific way to just about everything we do in our daily lives.  It&#039;s absurd that the EPA would embrace such a theory, particularly when it singles out biofuels and gives other forms of energy a free pass.  What&#039;s the indirect effect of defending our oil interests in the Persian Gulf region?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zubrin&#8217;s analysis is on the money.  Such an indirect effect analysis could be applied in a similar arbitrary and unscientific way to just about everything we do in our daily lives.  It&#8217;s absurd that the EPA would embrace such a theory, particularly when it singles out biofuels and gives other forms of energy a free pass.  What&#8217;s the indirect effect of defending our oil interests in the Persian Gulf region?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

