• DSC_1764
    DSC_1619
    DSC_1756
    DSC_1803
    DSC_1702
    DSC_1610
    Cindy and Carly attended the National Ethanol Conference in Orlando, FL. Check out their photos.
  • The Zimmcomm Network

  • Archives

  • Categories





Phibro Ethanol Performance Group Knows FDA

Phibro Chem Team at FEWFor those of you not familiar with an FDA, Food Additive Petition (FAP), the folks at Phibro Chem’s Ethanol Performance Group can help you understand what it means to ethanol producers. They market the antimicrobial product, Lactrol.

We normally think of the EPA when it comes to governmental regulations in this industry but FDA is getting more involved. That’s why a company like Phibro, with years of experience dealing with the agency because of the animal health side of their business is probably a little ahead of the curve on this.

I spoke with Richard Coulter, VP, Scientific & Regulatory Affairs and Paul Duquette, Director, Global Regulatory Affairs during the Fuel Ethanol Workshop about this issue. You can see their whole team that attended the conference in the picture.

Richard said they were attending to “talk to producers to inform them of what we’re doing in the regulatory process.” He wants them to know they’re staying on top of it. He says that late in 2008 the FDA decided to join with the EPA and USDA in regulating biofuels due primarily to distillers grains being fed to animals. He says that it’s important for producers to work with suppliers that know how to deal with the total regulatory process. It sounds like Phibro knows how when it comes to the FDA.

Paul says that when it comes to the Food Additive Petition there’s a learning curve going on between the industry and FDA. He says FDA has made it clear that everything that goes into the production of ethanol must be AAFCO approved, GRAS approved, have a regulatory or enforcement discretion letter and then the FAP. Both Richard and Paul say the industry is facing more regulation in the future.

2009 Fuel Ethanol Workshop Photo Album

You can listen to my interview with Richard and paul below:

    2 Comments »

  • June 26, 2009 — 8:03 am

    Richard Vakoc

    Goverment has encouraged ethanol plants to be built. Now the eniviromentalist are saying that using corn to produce ethanol is creating green house gases. Am I hearing this correctly.

  • July 6, 2009 — 11:53 am

    Corrie Hanel

    Corn is a very inefficient source of ethanol. Corn ethanol plants wouldn’t be standing without massive government subsidies. And the environmental “savings” are a wash at best, when one considers the resources needed to produce ethanol from corn (planting, harvesting, transporting, and mashing corn, then distilling and transporting ethanol) and the fact that the production process produces literally tons of CO2. There are your greenhouse gases.

    Also note that some companies, like Phibro, are trying to get antibiotics approved as HUMAN FOOD so they can continue to sell their products and make money. Think about that. Maybe soon you’ll be able to sprinkle a little antibiotic on your fries along with salt.

  • Comments RSS feedTrackBack URI

    Leave a Comment