Comments on: EPA Official Wrong on Ethanol and Biodiesel Yields http://domesticfuel.com/2009/07/02/epa-official-wrong-on-ethanol-and-biodiesel-yields/ Alternative Fuel News Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:00:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Grassley Hosting EPA Visit in Iowa « The Sugarcane Blog http://domesticfuel.com/2009/07/02/epa-official-wrong-on-ethanol-and-biodiesel-yields/comment-page-1/#comment-116228 Grassley Hosting EPA Visit in Iowa « The Sugarcane Blog Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:26:18 +0000 http://domesticfuel.com/?p=14595#comment-116228 [...] could have “on agriculture and family farmers.” The two EPA officials, Gina McCarthy and Margo Oge, will be in the state Sept. 3. They’ll get a briefing on an “information session” on corn and [...] [...] could have “on agriculture and family farmers.” The two EPA officials, Gina McCarthy and Margo Oge, will be in the state Sept. 3. They’ll get a briefing on an “information session” on corn and [...]

]]> By: Rebecca Richardson http://domesticfuel.com/2009/07/02/epa-official-wrong-on-ethanol-and-biodiesel-yields/comment-page-1/#comment-114327 Rebecca Richardson Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:40:22 +0000 http://domesticfuel.com/?p=14595#comment-114327 Aureon, you make great points. I watched the YouTube videos just after the Small Business Committee hearing and could not believe my ears! If the EPA isn't careful, they are going to cause the biofuel industry to disappear because of their lack of supportive action and their inexplicable determination to make the RFS2 implementation process far more onerous on the biofuel industry than on the petroleum industry which has always been the intent of the initiative. Does this irony escape us? Aureon, you make great points. I watched the YouTube videos just after the Small Business Committee hearing and could not believe my ears! If the EPA isn’t careful, they are going to cause the biofuel industry to disappear because of their lack of supportive action and their inexplicable determination to make the RFS2 implementation process far more onerous on the biofuel industry than on the petroleum industry which has always been the intent of the initiative. Does this irony escape us?

]]> By: Aureon Kwolek http://domesticfuel.com/2009/07/02/epa-official-wrong-on-ethanol-and-biodiesel-yields/comment-page-1/#comment-114289 Aureon Kwolek Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:14:01 +0000 http://domesticfuel.com/?p=14595#comment-114289 Is EPA official Margo Oge, being puppetted by her controllers? Why is the EPA making false claims embodied in an unproven theory called “indirect land use change”? A theory that was introduced by an attorney, not by a scientist or a qualified researcher. Oge is obviously NOT QUALIFIED for her role. Someone must be telling her what to say, because she doesn’t even understand basic biofuel facts. Is she a pawn in a rogue EPA agenda to distort climate change in order to restrict biofuels? A related story just hit the news: “Suppressed EPA scientist breaks silence, speaks on Fox News”, by Mark Tapscott (Fox News): Having worked at the EPA for 38 years, expert senior research analyst, Alan Carlin wrote an in-house report criticizing EPA’s stance on Global Warming. Carlin’s report was suppressed by EPA officials, who also instructed him to remain silent and not to talk to the press. Carlin went ahead and broke his silence anyway. According to Fox News, what Carlin’s report exposed was that the EPA has been riding the coattails of the UN’s manipulated and premature conclusions regarding global warming and indirect land use change theory. American taxpayers, are paying the salaries of EPA officials. Do we want our domestic biofuel industry to be restricted by the hidden agenda of UN policy that favors big oil? Or do we want our EPA to conduct balanced scientific research and draw its own conclusions – based on FACTUAL INFORMATION? Rep. Collin Peterson, Chairman of the House Agricultural Committee, recently accused the EPA with “being in bed with the oil industry”. One thing is for sure - the EPA is playing games and twisting information. This looks bad for President Obama. On the one hand, he’s telling farmers and biofuel producers that the biofuels industry is important, and on the other hand, he’s allowing the EPA to impose restrictions based on unscientific false assumptions and grossly inaccurate information. Is EPA official Margo Oge, being puppetted by her controllers? Why is the EPA making false claims embodied in an unproven theory called “indirect land use change”? A theory that was introduced by an attorney, not by a scientist or a qualified researcher. Oge is obviously NOT QUALIFIED for her role. Someone must be telling her what to say, because she doesn’t even understand basic biofuel facts. Is she a pawn in a rogue EPA agenda to distort climate change in order to restrict biofuels?

A related story just hit the news: “Suppressed EPA scientist breaks silence, speaks on Fox News”, by Mark Tapscott (Fox News):

Having worked at the EPA for 38 years, expert senior research analyst, Alan Carlin wrote an in-house report criticizing EPA’s stance on Global Warming. Carlin’s report was suppressed by EPA officials, who also instructed him to remain silent and not to talk to the press.

Carlin went ahead and broke his silence anyway. According to Fox News, what Carlin’s report exposed was that the EPA has been riding the coattails of the UN’s manipulated and premature conclusions regarding global warming and indirect land use change theory.

American taxpayers, are paying the salaries of EPA officials. Do we want our domestic biofuel industry to be restricted by the hidden agenda of UN policy that favors big oil? Or do we want our EPA to conduct balanced scientific research and draw its own conclusions – based on FACTUAL INFORMATION?

Rep. Collin Peterson, Chairman of the House Agricultural Committee, recently accused the EPA with “being in bed with the oil industry”. One thing is for sure – the EPA is playing games and twisting information.

This looks bad for President Obama. On the one hand, he’s telling farmers and biofuel producers that the biofuels industry is important, and on the other hand, he’s allowing the EPA to impose restrictions based on unscientific false assumptions and grossly inaccurate information.

]]>