<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethanol Report on Corn Grower Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticfuel.com/2009/08/30/ethanol-report-on-corn-grower-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/08/30/ethanol-report-on-corn-grower-conference/</link>
	<description>Alternative Fuel News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Brandon</title>
		<link>http://domesticfuel.com/2009/08/30/ethanol-report-on-corn-grower-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-116328</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfuel.com/?p=16681#comment-116328</guid>
		<description>While ILUC assumptions, data and methods may be greatly flawed, there is one comment I never see leveled and this comment has been proven without a doubt.  Life cycle CO2 emissions are based as a percentage improvement on gasoline.  The calculations end with BTUs in the tank.  Ethanol has the capacity for thermal efficiencies of diesel when used in appropriate IC engines.  Such a life cycle will reduce CO2 calculated emissions by a factor of about 1.7.  Even slightly modified legacy vehicles get significantly increased thermal efficencies when run on E30. This life cycle is not a real life cycle, just one when ethanol is poluted with too much gasoline.   When these real efficiency potentials of ethanol are ignored, one wonders if the &#039;researchers&#039; are just drinking ethanol rather than really studying its positive potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While ILUC assumptions, data and methods may be greatly flawed, there is one comment I never see leveled and this comment has been proven without a doubt.  Life cycle CO2 emissions are based as a percentage improvement on gasoline.  The calculations end with BTUs in the tank.  Ethanol has the capacity for thermal efficiencies of diesel when used in appropriate IC engines.  Such a life cycle will reduce CO2 calculated emissions by a factor of about 1.7.  Even slightly modified legacy vehicles get significantly increased thermal efficencies when run on E30. This life cycle is not a real life cycle, just one when ethanol is poluted with too much gasoline.   When these real efficiency potentials of ethanol are ignored, one wonders if the &#8216;researchers&#8217; are just drinking ethanol rather than really studying its positive potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

