• Cindy is covering the GROWMARK FS System “Gold Rush” event. The company is introducing re-formulated Dieselex Gold.
  • The Zimmcomm Network

  • Archives

  • Categories

Opposition Mounts Against Cape Wind Project

Less than two weeks ago, Iowa Governor Chet Culver and Rhode Island Governor Donald L. Carcieri released the “Great Expectations” wind energy report as commissioned by the Governors’ Wind Energy Coalition. The two governors met with Obama to share their findings, one of which is strong support for coastal, deep water and offshore wind energy technology, research and investment. The report states, “Congress must approve legislation that will allow for the efficient and timely review of wind projects on federal lands and in offshore coastal regions.” The first offshore wind project under federal consideration: Cape Wind, an offshore project that is set to be developed in Nantucket Sound and the winds are blowing furiously against approval for the project.

Photo Credit: lakewentworth via flickr

Interior Secretary Ken Salazer is set to make a historic decision on the project this month and to help make his decision, has reached out to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) to provide comments and recommendations that will factor into his decision. The ACHP has recommended that he not approve the project.

ACHP states, “The historic properties affected by the Project are significant, extensive, and closely interrelated. The Project will adversely affect 34 historic properties including 16 historic districts and 12 individually 2 significant historic properties on Cape Cod, Martha’s Vineyard, and Nantucket Island, and six properties of religious and cultural significance to tribes, including Nantucket Sound itself. These districts and standing structures reflect the broad array of properties that represent the rich and unique architectural, social, and cultural history of Cape Cod and the Islands.”

They continue, “Adverse effects on historic properties will be direct and indirect, cannot be avoided, and cannot be satisfactorily mitigated.”

The ACHP findings are raising the debate about offshore wind energy to a fever pitch and putting the Obama administration between a rock and a hard place. Does the administration, vocal in its support of offshore wind development make a choice for domestically produced renewable energy or to preserve a historic area? Nantucket Sound has been proposed for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, by ACHP, for its significance to the tribes and early American history and industry.

If the administration’s findings are in line with their energy choices last week (they approved offshore drilling and drilling in sensitive areas of Alaska) then my bet is the Obama administration doesn’t have the courage to make the choice for renewable energy. With criticisms flying about his decision to drill in pristine areas of Alaska, I don’t think the administration can absorb another “blight” on the American landscape so soon.

    7 Comments »

  • April 6, 2010 — 2:15 pm

    Jim C.

    Those who think wind turbines don’t come at a high visual price are deluded. When people claim they’re “beautiful” it knots my stomach. Wind turbines are just smaller version of hydroelectric turbines, raised up in the air and very conspicuous. Few environmentalists claim that hydroelectric is non-intrusive. Being blindly pro-wind has many hypocritical elements.

  • April 6, 2010 — 2:29 pm

    Jim C.

    Just as hydroelectric turbines dam rivers, wind turbines “damn” the landscape (and the ocean-scape) to permanent blight. There needs to more written about the similarities between both types of turbines and the hypocrisy of environmentalists who support one but condemn the other.

    Construction of new dams has been greatly slowed and even reversed (tear-downs) to protect the ecology, and the same ethic should be applied to wind turbines. Their noise and rotation impacts wildlife in numerous ways; not just bird-kills.

    There seems to be a new breed of “techno-enviro” who thinks providing gluttonous, overpopulated people with “green” power overrides all other concerns about nature. A new age of industrial blight is replacing an old one and historical lessons are being ignored.

  • April 6, 2010 — 7:08 pm

    Max C.

    86% pro Cape Wind Mass residents. Opposition mounts? That’s a lot of mounting. And what’s with the pretty photo? I didn’t even have to read the article to know what direction the wind was blowing.

  • April 6, 2010 — 7:54 pm

    Lisa

    It is ludicrous to think that a wind field belongs in Nantucket Sound any more than an oil field does. I’m all for green, but common sense, people!! This is one of the most beautiful, storied, historical spots in all of America! Its location suits only the industrialist Jim Gordon, the president of Cape Wind. There ARE alternatives and there are nearby alternatives.

  • April 6, 2010 — 8:10 pm

    Cindy Zimmerman

    Max – 70% of the American people were opposed to the health care bill that was just signed by the president. Majority does not necessarily rule. And if you did read the article you would know that it is in favor of wind energy.

  • April 6, 2010 — 9:48 pm

    Robbyn Candelaria

    I am an environmentalist who is all for clean & renewable energy — ethically developed. Nantucket Sound is no place for an industrial wind farm, as it would destroy ancestral and sacred areas of the Wampanoag Nation. Imagine how far Cape Wind would get if they asked for a permit to dredge, dig, and decimate then plant 130 440-ft. tall turbines and a power station — in the Sea of Galilee.

  • [...] such fight is underway in Massachusetts where candidates continue to fight the first federally approved off-shore wind project in Cape Cod. Their complaints: the cost of the [...]

  • Comments RSS feedTrackBack URI

    Leave a Comment