The Auto Channel Fights for Ethanol
The Auto Channel has been a proponent of ethanol for quite some time and has given favorable coverage to the fuel. This week, Executive Vice President and Co-Publisher, Marc J Rauch, took it up a notch in defense of ethanol. In his piece, “The Auto Channel Fights for the Truth about Ethanol Versus Gasoline,” Rauch writes, “Bob [Gordon] and I have studied the issue of alternative fuels and energy and we’ve become very enthusiastic supporters of all the technologies…But most of all, we like ethanol. Why? Because ethanol can be used right now, anywhere in the U.S., and by most vehicles without any engine conversions.”
He then talks about higher ethanol blends and says that the reality is most conventional vehicles can use up to E50 without conversions and without being official flex-fuel vehicles. (For those of you following the E15 Waiver, the latest news is that E15 will probably pass but with a stipulation on what model years can use the fuel.) He then goes on to state that while many don’t believe that there is a ‘single bullet’ solution, he and Bob disagree and believe that ethanol, or alcohol fuel, is the solution to replace gasoline.
However, where it starts to get really interesting is when Rauch reiterates, “But the point of this story is to tell you about our fight to overcome the lies and misconceptions about ethanol that are promulgated by the oil and gasoline industries.” It looks like more and more people are finally seeing through the ethanol smear campaign that has been heavily active for the past three or so years.
Yet the highlight of the story is when Ruach takes on some anti-ethanol “experts” who came to light when consumers pointed to them as criticisms for his and Gordon’s support of ethanol. David Fridley, a scientist at the Lawrence-Livermore Laboratory in Northern California, and Jerry Taylor, a Senior Fellow at the CATO Institute in Washington, D.C. who was featured in a John Stossel story (20 Minutes) and also the author of, “An Economic Critique of Corn-Ethanol Subsidies.”
Rauch writes, “After watching the Stossel/Taylor and Fridley videos I sent them both emails expressing how appalled I was at their lack of knowledge and recitation of lies, and offering various facts that contradict their statements.” Rauch published his correspondence with Taylor and it is a great piece of ethanol education for anyone who wants to learn more about the fuel.
So for you ethanol advocates out there, take a piece out of Rauch’s playbook (I don’t think he’ll mind if you’re spreading the good word about ethanol) and help him fight the good fight for ethanol. You can read Rauch’s piece in full, with supporting documentation here.



3 Comments »
Martin Tjossem
That is good news. My old 1992 Toyota 4×4 is still happy using E50 after a little more than 9 years.
Cyril Fletcher
At last the truth is out, and at last the Oil and Gasolene industries have been caught with their hands in the till so to speak, they will fight this tooth and nail dont you forget that. They have enormouse resources and will bribe members of the scientific comunities to come out to bat for them, it needs guys like Martin Tjosen to really highlight the lies, as he said hes used it for 9 years, if anything was going to happen to his car it would happened long ago. Also dont forget this little bit of info, most on capitol Hill are stock holders in the oil industry, they also have an incentive to halt, block, or frustrate the efforts of the alternative fuels industry, dont forget, if you destroy th oil industry, you are also destroying the internationall terrorist, they are funded by the oil states knowingly or unknowingly, keep up the good work,
Book Review – Powering The Future
[...] don’t have the space to dismiss these bad biofuel arguments – I’ll leave it up to you loyal readers to help me out. And since many of our ethanol and [...]
Comments RSS feed — TrackBack URI
Leave a Comment