Green Scissors 2010 Calls for Cut in Wasteful Spending
At the helm of Friends of the Earth, a new report was released today highlighting government programs and subsidies that are wasteful to taxpayers, harmful to the environment and bad for consumers. The Green Scissors 2010 report targeted four major areas for budget cuts including energy, agriculture and biofuels, infrastructure, and public lands.
Many of the recommendations of this report come as no surprise to the agricultural and biofuels industry, as over the past two weeks, members of Friends of the Earth surreptitiously called agricultural organizations across the country, questioning them about their methods of production.
According to an industry insider whose company received multiple calls from various people in the employ of Friends of the Earth, the organization was asking questions about ground water quality (ag production, mainly corn and soybeans have been linked to the Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone) and hypoxia; two issues that have made national headlines in recent weeks. It is also no secret that Friends of the Earth has engaged in an active anti-agribusiness and biofuels campaign over the past few years, and the environmental organization has been tied to Big Oil through contribution monies.
It should be known that, Friends of the Earth, along with the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and the Clean Air Task Force are currently engaged in a campaign to end the ethanol tax credit (VEETC) as well as the ethanol tariff. They have specifically attacked Growth Energy’s corn-ethanol advertising campaign in the Beltway.
They write on their website, “Tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer money has already been wasted under the credit [VEETC]. And these funds do little more than to further line the coffers of the oil industry. This coalition is working to prevent an additional 30 billion plus dollars from being lavished on the industry to fulfill a legally mandated requirement to blend an environmentally harmful fuel into another environmentally harmful one.”
Read the rest of this post…



Ethanol hit a home run at the
With the help of 
On July 17, 

Testimony at the hearing came from USDA Undersecretary for Rural Development Dallas Tonsager,
Gen. Clark’s testimony before the committee on behalf of corn ethanol was passionate and emphatic, with his opening statement running more than twice as long as the five minutes allotted for each witness. “Today we do have a liquid fuel alternative to imported oil, and that alternative is ethanol,” said Clark, stressing that those imports cost $300 billion a year. “It’s $1000 per man, woman and child in America, every year, just so we can fill up our tanks with foreign oil.” Clark called corn-based ethanol an “incredible jewel of innovation” and expressed pride in the fact that it was developed here in the United States. 



U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack and Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland toured the
A study conducted by Iowa State University’s
Partial funding for the report was provided by a grant from 
In the report titled
The