Oil Scores a Victory in House, Ethanol Continues Battle
In an update to a story posted earlier this week, in a late night vote the House of Representatives have approved provisions that would block the implementation of E15 into the marketplace. Rep. John Sullivan (R-OK) presented a provision to the House Continuing Resolution (a short-term resolution that would fund the government through the end of this year) that would block the EPA from its ability to roll out E15 and Rep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) presented a provision that would disallow blender pumps and ethanol storage facilities. Both provisions were accepted into the resolution that was passed by the House.
“The Sullivan provision picks politics over science. EPA’s consideration of E15 was based on a more exhaustive study and collection of data than any of the 11 previously-approved petitions. No other fuel mix has been tested more,” said Tom Buis, CEO of Growth Energy, which filed the Green Jobs Waiver for E15 in March 2009. “With all the turmoil going on in the Middle East and elsewhere, the House of Representatives just voted to stop the only viable alternative to foreign oil: ethanol. It is the wrong move at the wrong time for the wrong reasons.”
Renewable Fuels President and CEO Bob Dinneen expressed his frustration with the action made by the House. “Last night, political science trumped physical science. The fact remains ethanol is a thoroughly tested, safe, and effective motor fuel. Americans spend nearly $1 billion a day importing oil, often from hostile regions of the world. If the chaos in the Middle East teaches us anything, it should be that America must forcefully begin down the path of energy self-reliance. Increasing the use of domestic renewable fuels like ethanol is the first, and arguably, the easiest step we can take.”
While at this point, these provisions are not law, the Senate must also pass an identical package and from there the president must also sign the bill. President Obama has indicated that he would veto a bill that contains provisions that blocks biofuels from entering the market. Not only will these provisions keep the country from meeting its renewable fuels goals set out in the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS2) of 36 billion gallons of renewable fuels by 2022, but it keeps the country beholden to energy produced from oil produced in volatile regions.
Growth Energy points out several statistics about E15:
- ∙ E15 is the most tested fuel blend in our nation’s history.
- ∙ DOE and EPA have both said that ethanol does not harm engine durability nor emissions equipment for vehicles 2001 and newer (which represents nearly 70 percent of all vehicles in the United States and 75percent of all the fuel consumed).
- ∙ Delphi, the global maker of engine parts, recently stated that it has been supplying E15-compliant fuel pumps since 1992, and that its fuel pumps today can even handle E25 blends.
- ∙ E15 will reduce our dependence on foreign oil by 7 billion gallons annually.
- ∙ E15 will create up to 136,000 American jobs that can’t be outsourced.
- ∙ E15 will improve our environment – corn ethanol has 59 percent fewer harmful emissions compared to conventional gasoline.
- ∙ E15 will inject $24.4 billion into the U.S. economy and help keep more U.S. money within our own borders.
- ∙ E15 is voluntary.
- ∙ Without E15, you are mandating that 90 percent of all fuel will be petroleum-based. Capping the blend at 10 percent will prevent the development of next-generation biofuels.
- ∙ On February 20, Sunoco Green E15 will debut at the Daytona 500. The blend of 15 percent corn-based ethanol will be used in all three NASCAR series during the 2011 season.
Last summer, Growth Energy introduced the Fueling Freedom plan, a proposal that would open the transportation fuels market by investing in ethanol infrastructure like blender pumps and allow consumers a fuel choice at the pump.
“At a time of increasing instability in oil exporting countries, this job killing amendment from Rep. Flake would deepen our addiction to foreign oil and further hurt our economy by limiting consumer access to the only commercially viable fuel alternative that is cleaner and more cost efficient than gasoline refined from oil,” said Buis. “Passage by the House is only the first step in this process. We will fight to remove these provisions in the Senate.”
Dinneen added, “The House has denied consumers choice in the type of fuel they use. Instead, they have chosen to continue giving oil companies a virtual monopoly over the fueling system. Our dependence on imported oil is neither safe nor sustainable. As the world’s largest oil companies tell us they can’t find new sources of oil, this House measure would seek to relegate future generations to a preventable future of oil dependence.”



8 Comments »
Martin Tjossem
I sure hope the group that is against ethanol cuts off all funding for the Fifth Fleet based in Bahrain also.
Bob Winnson
Most Republicans (the true conservative Republicans, and not the shills for Big Oil) as well as Democrats are supportive of American renewable fuels. Funny how the oil shills sneak these things in. The others must have thought that they had to pick their fights, and know that these provisions will not stand. One more opportunity to see who the real oil shills are in the Republican party–these guys need to be tossed in their next primaries. Flake is a real flake, but Sullivan being from Oklahoma may have plenty of backing by the oil folks (and the voters) there. The IPAA has their eye on their lackey Flake, who is running for Senate in ’12.
http://www.bipac.net/page.asp?chk=jClXnU&content=112th_open_seats&g=ipaa&parent=bipac
Bob Winnson
How Flake supports Big Oil:
http://www.bipac.net/incumbent_detail.asp?chk=jClXnU&g=ipaa&leg_id_num=22511
And Sullivan:
http://www.bipac.net/incumbent_detail.asp?chk=jClXnU&g=ipaa&leg_id_num=6095
JOHN MONTE
YOU ARECORRECT E85 IS THE MOST AND E85 ADDS MORE GREEN HOUSES GASES AND IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN GASOLINE WITHOUT EATHONOL.
On average, all regulated emissions either decreased or showed no statistically significant difference with E85 compared with gasoline. Emissions that increased with the use of E85 included formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and methane.
E85 (15% ethanol, 85% gasoline) produces higher amounts of a group of chemicals known as aldehydes than gasoline when burned. In addition to likely being carcinogens, aldehydes are also a precursor to the formation of ozone. Breathing ozone has been shown to cause severe respiratory problems—which is why those ionizer air cleaners that are so pervasive these days are a complete crock; they may clean particles out of the air, but they generate ozone in the process.
Steve_V
To John Monte
You should really go back and hit the books before you post your opinion. Don’t you know that gasoline also produces Formaldehyde and Acetaldehyde emission? From the SAE papers I have, gasoline produces more formaldehyde under the USO6 drive cycle then does E85. Yes, Acetaldehyde emissions do increase for E85 under FTP drive cycles but nearly disappear under the US06 because the TWC (Three Way Catalysis) is very effective. Any car traveling on a freeway or commuting more than a few miles to work will have higher emissions then what is demonstrated under FTP drive cycles.
The EPA methodology only tests E85 in the weaker areas. If I was to put up US06 drive cycle data, E85 would look very good in all areas of regulated and unregulated emissions. And as far as health effect emissions, shouldn’t you look into how the petroleum industry blends ethanol. We maybe able to get you to embrace ethanol when all is said and done.
Advanced BioFuels USA » House Turns against Ethanol in E15 Votes
[...] [...]
dan
i like going to ethanol obtained from trash
1) we have a lot of trash
2) we have flex fuel vehicles
3) this will reduce amount of oil we need
http://www.coskata.com
New Study – More Ethanol Commitment Needed to Meet RFS2 - Domestic Fuel
[...] there are concerns growing that RFS2 goals will not be met, in part due to several anti-ethanol amendments in the Continuing Resolution that were passed by the House several weeks ago designed to “balance the federal [...]
Comments RSS feed — TrackBack URI
Leave a Comment