Judge seeks accord in AIDS suit
The Record (Bergen County, NJ) September 9, 2004 | EMAN VAROQUA, STAFF WRITER EMAN VAROQUA, STAFF WRITER The Record (Bergen County, NJ) 09-09-2004 Judge seeks accord in AIDS suit — Ugly accusations could be aired in Paterson By EMAN VAROQUA, STAFF WRITER Date: 09-09-2004, Thursday Section: LOCAL Edtion: Two Star P A state judge urged the Paterson City Council and an AIDS outreach group to settle their differences out of court or, he said, a trial set for next week would get ugly.
Superior Court Judge Robert J. Passero repeatedly advised both sides Wednesday at a hearing before him in Paterson, “if I were you, I would try to resolve this thing.” If not, a trial scheduled for Monday would explore – in great detail – allegations of favoritism and wrongdoing lodged by both sides, Passero said.
A formal complaint against the City Council was filed by the Ryan White Planning Council, an AIDS group based in Paterson and serving Bergen and Passaic counties. It is asking that the City Council show why it did not approve a resolution allowing the group to accept a $4 million grant. If that resolution is not approved by Sept. 15, the group said, it could lose the funding. freegrantmoneynow.net free grant money
The city’s signature is necessary for the group to get the money, and the group wants Passero to award the grant as presented.
William F. Rupp, the attorney for the City Council, said that the council approved most of the resolutions for the grant, and that only $256,000 was still in question, not $4 million.
The Ryan White Planning Council, formed in 1993, receives a large grant from the national group and then hands out smaller grants to providers of HIV/AIDS services at the local level. The group was looking to grant 23 contracts for service for a total of $4 million. The council accepted 16 of those, but did not approve the remaining seven – which equal $256,000. Rupp said that the council did not approve all of the resolutions because it caught wind of allegations of “racial discrimination,” “bias,” and “improper review.” During the back and forth at Wednesday’s hearing, accusations of “political cronies,” “favoritism,” and “behind the scenes discussions” flew around. Both sides said they would clarify what was meant with these accusations at trial. web site free grant money
“I’m the wrong judge to be before when things like this come out,” Passero said. “I strongly recommend that you meet with all the powers that be and work this out.” Frank Covello, the attorney representing the AIDS group, argued Tuesday that it was not up to the council to change contracts. He said it had only the power to approve or deny the resolutions, but instead the council tried to change monetary figures and award less money to those final seven contracts in question. The shift in funding, according to court documents, increased funding for substance abuse services, but decreased funding for primary medical care, transportation, drug reimbursement, housing, and case management.
Rupp countered that the City Council rescinded its May vote on the matter and would vote on it again at its next meeting Sept. 14.
“The public interest is at stake here,” Passero said, referring to the $4 million in free grant money. “That’s too much to lose.” Passero ordered all court documents to be filed by Friday, and if the matter isn’t settled, a trial will start Monday.
* * * * * *
EMAN VAROQUA, STAFF WRITER