• The Domestic Fuel team was on location at the 2012 National Ethanol Conference. Enjoy the photos.
  • The Zimmcomm Network

  • Archives

  • Categories

WASDE: Soybean Exports Up; Biodiesel Unchanged

usda-logo2It looks like there will be plenty of soybeans for food and fuel use, especially since the non-renewal of the biodiesel tax incentive seems to have put a lot of refineries’ operations on hold.

The latest World Agriculture Supply and Demand Estimate report from the USDA pushes up the 2009 U.S. soybean crop now to an estimated record 3.36 billion bushels, up 42 million bushels from the previous month. Biodiesel Magazine reports that soybean export projections were raised 35 million bushels to a record 1.38 billion led by strong sales and shipments to China and several other markets including Taiwan, Thailand, Egypt, and Canada:

The projected U.S. soybean crush was raised 15 million bushels from the previous month’s report to 1.71 billion reflecting increased soybean meal exports. Soybean ending stocks were projected at 245 million bushels, down 10 million from last month. Despite increased crush, soybean oil production was reduced due to a lower extraction rate. With projected use unchanged, soybean oil stocks were projected at 2.15 billion pounds, down 155 million from last month. The estimate for methyl ester use was unchanged at 2.2 billion pounds for the current 2009/10 marketing year. That compares with 1.9 billion pounds in 2008/09 and 3.24 billion pounds the previous year.

The report goes on to say that U.S. soybean yields averaged an estimated 44 bushels an acre, also a record. Hopefully, this increased size of crop and higher yields will quiet some of the critics who say we can’t have food and fuel.

Report: Enough Corn, Soybeans for Ethanol, Biodiesel

AgMRC3A new report indicates there will be enough corn and soybeans for ethanol and biodiesel production, as well as the feed, food and export uses those crops are tasked with.

But the evaluation from the Agricultural Marketing Resource Center‘s Robert Wisner, Professor of Economics and Energy Economist, says things could get tight if next year’s crop is hit with bad weather or a natural disaster:

WisnerFor 2009-10, the current corn crop estimate points to adequate corn supplies for feed, food, fuel, and export uses. Carryover stocks on August 31 of next year are expected to be about 1 and one-half weeks above minimum working stocks levels. Our early and very tentative normal-yield projections for 2010-11 show corn carryover stocks declining slightly by August 31, 2011 but still remaining marginally above minimum working stocks levels.

Wisner does note that there’s not a lot of margin for error in case the Corn Belt gets hit with drought or flooding. He says that will keep corn prices volatile should any inclement weather show up.

As far as soybeans and biodiesel, they should be OK, if, once again, the crops turn out as expected:

[T]he availability of soybeans and soybean oil for 2009-10 and 2010-11 is not indicated to be a major constraint on biodiesel production in U.S. if South American crops are near normal. Supplies for the current marketing year are a little tighter than indicated at this time last year because of extreme weather problems in South America last winter and early spring. However, U.S. and EU government policy actions that limit biodiesel demand and create uncertainty about future policies are a constraint on U.S. biodiesel production. That, in turn, makes 2010-11 soybean availability for biofuels and other uses look a little more adequate than anticipated a year ago.

You can read all of Wisner’s report in the January 2010 edition of the Ag MRC’s Renewable Energy Newsletter.

Soybean Checkoff, Clean Cities Promote Biodiesel

USBA group that promotes the use of soybeans and a program that works to reduce local petroleum consumption are partnering again to promote the use of soy biodiesel next year.

This article from radio station KFGO in Fargo, ND-Moorhead, MN
says the United Soybean Board’s soybean checkoff and the U.S. Department of Energy-affiliated (USDOE) Clean Cities’ chapters will develop programs that promote the benefits of soy biodiesel:

“The soybean checkoff continued this program to support the use of soy biodiesel in any diesel motor to show how biodiesel is cleaner burning and better for the environment while supporting U.S. agriculture,” says Geno Lowe, a soybean farmer from Hebron, Md., and soybean checkoff leader. “We expect we’ll see some inventive proposals such as school bus demonstrations to public transportation uses to heavy equipment uses by state or local governments or maybe even a bioheat promotion project.”

Biodiesel promotion and education has proved to be important to U.S. soybean farmers’ bottom lines. A checkoff-funded study found that U.S. soybean farmers received an additional $2.5 billion in net returns over the last four years due to the biodiesel industry’s demand for soybean oil. It shows this demand added up to 25 cents in support for the per-bushel price of soybeans.

USB will provide up to $100,000 for funding soy biodiesel communications programs. The biodiesel reimbursement application process has been opened up, and USB is encouraging Clean Cities chapters to partner with Qualified State Soybean Boards (QSSBs) for this project. Selected participants will be announced in the middle of next month.

ASA, Biodiesel Board Call for RFS2 Comments

ASANBBThe deadline for getting in your two cents’ worth on the U.S. EPA’s proposed Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS2) is rapidly approaching, as this Friday, Sept. 25th will mark the end of the comment period.

This article in Biodiesel Magazine says the American Soybean Association and the National Biodiesel Board are making a last-minute appeal to their members and biodiesel supporters to get their comments in:

Both organizations have made it easy to access information at their Web sites, providing background information, sample comments, links to the EPA Web site and instructions on emailing comments. The ASA form is available at www.soygrowers.com/policy/RFS2.htm. The NBB’s action center is available at http://biodiesel.org/news/RFS/. The NBB provides an express comment that features a condense message and only requires a name, city, state and email address. “it takes less than 20 seconds to fill out and submit,” the NBB says. The NBB also offers long and short versions of sample comments to make, and provides information for an individual to craft a unique response.

The stakes are high for the biodiesel industry. “As EPA’s proposed rule is written, soy biodiesel would no longer qualify under the specific federal mandate for biomass-based diesel use,” ASA President Johnny Dodson explained. “With the future of the U.S. biodiesel industry at stake, farmers need to get involved right now by voicing their opposition to the proposed rule.” The ASA has reached out to U.S. soybean farmers in their campaign, as have several state soybean associations and corn grower associations as well to comment on the impact on corn ethanol.

The main sticking point the ASA and NBB (and the Renewable Fuels Association, for that matter) have with the proposal is the inclusion of international indirect land use impacts into the calculations of greenhouse gas emissions.

If you haven’t commented yet, better get your thoughts in now.

Biodiesel Nets Soy Growers Extra $2.5 Bil Since 2005

USBAmerican soybean growers have netted an extra $2.5 billion over the past four years, thanks to demand for soybean-based biodiesel.

This story from Feedtuffs.com says a new United Soybean Board and soybean checkoff-funded study also found that biodiesel added 25 cents to the price of a bushel of soybeans:

Because the price of petroleum diesel has such a large influence on the price of biodiesel and soybean oil, the study asserts that the biodiesel industry has essentially created a new floor for soybean oil prices.

Additionally, the study found that higher demand for soybean oil led to an increased supply of soybean meal, resulting in meal prices dropping by $19 to $45 per ton.

SoyBiodiesel“Any lowering of the price of inputs for the animal agriculture industry is a plus,” Bainbridge said. “The swine and dairy industries have had a tough time lately. This is a benefit for them. Every little bit helps in the poultry and livestock industries as far as decreasing their costs. And this demonstrates how biodiesel demand can have a positive impact on this important aspect of our food supply.”

You can read the results of the study at the USB Web site.

E85 and Biodiesel Promo in Sioux Rapids, IA

first-coop-assnThe First Coop Association held a grand opening celebration today from 10 a.m. until 2 p.m. for their new ethanol and biodiesel pumps. The station, located on Hwy. 71 South in Sioux Rapids, Iowa featured free food and ethanol and biodiesel specials.

irfaThe First Coop Association is one of many stations to take advantage of the Renewable Fuels Promotional Assistance Program sponsored by the Iowa Corn Promotion Board, the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association (IRFA) and the Iowa Soybean Association. Through the Renewable Fuels Promotional Assistance Program, Iowa Corn and IRFA partners with retailers for grand openings for E85 and ethanol blender dispensers. Iowa Soybean and IRFA partners with retailers for grand openings for biodiesel dispensers.

Retailers interested in installing an E85 or biodiesel dispenser can apply for a grant from the Iowa Department of Economic Development.

There are currently 129 E85 facilities in the state of Iowa.

DF Cast: Biodiesel Makes Engines Roar

usb-tractor-pull-shramekOn a warm, clear summer evening in Central Missouri, the night air practically thunders to life as 3,000 horsepower of tractor-pulling power is started and modified machines of farm implement heritage rumble down a dirt track. While the behemoths of the National Tractor Pullers Association Midwest Extreme Truck and Tractor Pull are pushed to the limits of what an engine will do, they are doing it with a green blend of soybean-based B20 biodiesel.

usb-tractor-pull-bungartThis United Soybean Board (USB) and soybean checkoff sponsored event is a chance to highlight the great performance of the green fuel in these extreme conditions.

Domestic Fuel caught up with a couple of the players at the recent event in Jefferson City… corn & soybean farmer and puller Dennis Shramek, along with Donnie Bungart, who makes and runs the biodiesel-powered sleds… to get their thoughts on the sport and the biodiesel that fuels all that power.

You can hear their comments… and feel a bit of the biodiesel-fueled thunder… here: DFCast-9-04-09.mp3

You can also subscribe to the DomesticFuel Cast here.

Biodiesel Powers Sleds and Tractors

"ChuckWhat do you think of when you hear that there's a sled running on biodiesel? Probably not thinking tractor pull sled are you? Unless you're a tractor pull fan. Well those big machines that the tractors and trucks pull are also diesel powered and in Jefferson City, MO there's a company that manufactures them and runs them on biodiesel.

The company is Bungart Motor Sports and I learned about if from Donnie Bungart.

"BungartDonnie says they do over 160 shows a year around the country. At the Midwest Extreme Truck and Tractor Pull in Jefferson City he says they had two sleds in operation. He says they run B20 in them and have been for over 3 years very successfully. Donnie says they've had a lot of luck locating the fuel when they need it, especially at major truck stops.

So if you're not a tractor pulling enthusiast you might ask, "What's a sled?" Donnie says it's a weight transfer machine. It starts out not weighing much but as the tractor pulls it more and more weight is transferred which ultimately stops the tractor. At least we hope! Thanks again to the United Soybean Board for inviting me out to the tractor pull.

You can listen to my interview with Donnie below:

Dr. Botches surgery: jury returns $17.25 million verdict.(Medical Law Case of the Month)

Medical Law’s Regan Report September 1, 2004 | Tammelleo, A. David CASE ON POINT: Durham v. Vinson, 2004 WL23769885 S.E.2d–SC.

ISSUE: The peer review privilege protects physicians from disclosure of information, which is the product of the peer review process. Public policy dictates that peer reviews should result in an objective review of the conduct of physicians. However, in this case, a plaintiff’s attorney elicited admissions as to whether or not a physician (whom his client had alleged was guilty of medical malpractice) had qualified to perform certain surgical procedures.

CASE FACTS: Nellie Durham was referred to Dr. David Vinson, Jr., for a surgical evaluation after being diagnosed with acid reflux and hiatal hernia. Dr. Vinson attempted to repair the hernia by performing a Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (LNF)-an advanced form of laparoscopic surgery. During the LNF, Dr. Vinson did not “take down” the short gastric vessels, which would have prevented the repair from being “too tight.” Initially, the patient appeared to respond well to the surgery. However, she began to vomit and had trouble swallowing. An esophagram indicated that food particles were dispersed throughout the esophagus and that the esophagus was not completely clearing the barium used in the esophagram. As a result, Dr. Vinson performed an Esophageal Gastroduodenoscopy (EGD). During the EGD, the patient’s gag reflex was suppressed. It was not clear whether the patient aspirated during this procedure or during repair surgery. However, it was clear, that the patient aspirated while under the care of Dr. Vinson and that, most likely, the aspiration occurred during the EGD. Dr. Vinson performed a repair LNF surgery on the patient. During this surgery, Dr. Vinson “took down” the short gastric vessels. He also instructed Diane Hardy, Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA), to advance a dilator down the patient’ esophagus during surgery. The CRNA protested that it was “too tight” three times. However, she followed Dr. Vinson’s orders. As a result the esophagus was perforated. Dr. Vinson switched from preforming the procedure laparoscopically to performing an open procedure to repair the perforation. After the repair LNF surgery, the patient could not breath without mechanical assistance and was transferred to the hospital’s Critical Care Unit (CCU). Dr. Vinson informed the patient’s family that “everything had gone well” and that “She was only in the CCU as a precaution.” While the patient was in the CCU, the family requested that Dr. Vinson consult a pulmonologist. However, he did not do so. The patient’s family also requested that the patient be moved to Greenville Memorial Hospital, a better-equipped facility. However, Dr. Vinson advised against the transfer. Two days later, the family obtained a transfer order from a nurse. The patient entered Greenville Memorial Hospital and remained there for over two months. The patient’s family did not learn that the patient’s esophagus had been perforated until the patient was moved to Greenville Hospital. Her first month there was spent in the CCU. The patient developed adult respiratory distress syndrome and later, developed pulmonary fibrosis. The patient can walk for only very short distances and requires supplemental oxygen twenty-four hours a day. The patient brought suit for medical malpractice against Dr. Vinson. After the liability phase of a bifurcated trial, a jury found Dr. Vinson liable to the patient for $2,250,000 in actual damages. After finding Dr. Vinson’s conduct was willful, wanton, and in reckless disregard of the patient’s rights, the jury awarded the patient $15 million in punitive damages. Dr. Vinson filed post-trial motions. The trial court found that the jury’s award did not violate Dr. Vinson’s due process rights, but reduced the award for punitive damages to $8 million. Dr. Vinson appealed. go to web site greenville memorial hospital in our site greenville memorial hospital

COURT’S OPINION The Supreme Court of South Carolina affirmed the judgment in part and reversed it in part. The court held that any error that the trial court committed was harmless error, and that Dr. Vinson’s liability for the injuries to the patient was clear based on the uncontradicted evidence that Dr. Vinson committed a “gross breach” of the standard of care.

LEGAL COMMENTARY: Evidence of Dr. Vinson’s negligence was overwhelming. The breach of his duty of care to the patient was uncontradicted. Dr. Vinson’s liability was so clear that any error committed by the trial judge, other than in the punitive damage phase of the case, was “harmless error” and could not be used to justify a reversal of the judgment on the jury’s verdict on actual damages.

Tammelleo, A. David